I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent (General)
@maduraimahesh - Can't you understand my English? Every one knows that any Individual can open any number of Accounts and everyone knows that opening a Live Account is Free.
My Question to you is, If Uniglobe executed Fraudulent Transactions in @hindinfra account then why didn't Uniglobe didn't execute fraudulent transactions in your Account? Please understand this Question. Read it again. Try to Understand. If you can't understand, please show my messages to a person well verse with English and then try to understand my Question.
One more question to you, You opened another Account with Uniglobe later in 2017, Didn't you know that Uniglobe was Fraudulent by then? Why did you chose to Trade again with Uniglobe? Please understand this Question. Read it again. Try to Understand. If you can't understand, please show my messages to a person well verse with English and then try to understand my Question.
You got the IP address from Uniglobe. Now you can find out which individual used it by contacting the Service Provider and also you can get the MAC address of the Device which was used to execute the Transactions. Who is stopping you from identifying the culprit? You just want to create a confusion and escape from this situation.
Now go ahead and find out the Person who used the IP address. Just claiming that the IP address was not used by @Saran92 is not sufficient enough. Either prove that the IP address was used by Uniglobe's Executives or find out the Person who used the IP address. But, you wil not do it? Because, the IP address will lead to either @Saran92 or his Co-Workers.
If I was @hindinfra, I would get all the required information from Uniglobe and with the help of Trade History, I will find out the Culprit who executed those Loss Trades.
I'm not supporting Uniglobe. I have the right to suspect both @Saran92 and Uniglobe.
Complete thread:
- I SUPPORT SARAN92, GENUINE TRADER -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-14, 21:42
- <-- removed by Admin --> -
kavin.c,
2017-03-15, 00:12
- I DON'T SUPPORT SARAN92, GENUINE TRADER - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 00:19
- I SUPPORT SARAN92, GENUINE TRADER - maduraimahesh, 2017-03-15, 05:46
- I SUPPORT SARAN92, GENUINE TRADER -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 05:58
- I SUPPORT SARAN92, GENUINE TRADER - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 20:27
- I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent -
kavin.c,
2017-03-15, 20:25
- I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 22:16
- I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 23:16
- Yes, I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 23:28
- I TRUST MY TRADER -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 22:20
- i too support mahesh, our trader is genuine only -
raja26,
2017-03-15, 22:25
- i too support mahesh, our trader is genuine only - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 23:18
- I TRUST MY TRADER -
kavin.c,
2017-03-15, 23:24
- I TRUST MY TRADER -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 23:34
- I TRUST MY TRADER - kavin.c, 2017-03-16, 03:26
- I TRUST MY TRADER -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 23:34
- i too support mahesh, our trader is genuine only -
raja26,
2017-03-15, 22:25
- Mr.Kevin this is for you -
raja26,
2017-03-15, 22:29
- Mr.Kevin this is for you - kavin.c, 2017-03-15, 23:21
- I don't support Saran92, No Integrity & Not Transparent -
maduraimahesh,
2017-03-15, 22:16
- <-- removed by Admin --> -
kavin.c,
2017-03-15, 00:12